DIVERSITY: THE KEY TO LIVING TOGETHER

Utku Perktas
Biogeography Letters
3 min readApr 28, 2024

--

Diversity is crucial for both human societies and nature, as it enables harmonious coexistence. When we incorporate biological perspectives into our understanding of diversity, we specifically refer to ‘biodiversity’ or ‘biological diversity.’ This means all the different kinds of life on Earth, from genes to ecosystems, and includes the processes of evolution, ecology, and culture that make life possible.

Diversity is essential for the harmonious coexistence of both human societies and the natural world. When we integrate biological concepts into our view of diversity, we use terms like ‘biodiversity’ or ‘biological diversity’ to describe it.

One way to understand this complex process is to focus on how some species specialize in specific areas. For example, different bird species have unique beaks and body shapes that guide them to different food sources. Sometimes, the variety in their behaviors, not just their physical traits, is key to their adaptation. Bird watchers know the thrill of identifying different species that look similar but feed on the same tree. For biologists, it’s fascinating to see how many similar species can thrive together in close areas. For instance, the warblers of America’s forests provide a fine example of niche diversity. These warblers have developed unique lifestyles in specific parts of the forest, sometimes even in specific parts of a tree.

If you want to listen to this article in Turkish, you can watch this YouTube video.

In the 1950s, ecologist Robert H. MacArthur studied the feeding habits of five warbler species in the Maine forests for his doctoral work. He discovered that each species had a clear specialization pattern in their feeding behavior. The warblers preferred different sections of spruce trees, each showing a unique feeding strategy in their preferred areas. MacArthur’s work vividly illustrates Darwin’s concept of ‘nature’s economy.’

Robert H. MacArthur got his Ph.D. from Yale University in 1957. His thesis studied how five warbler species shared living spaces in the pine forests of Maine and Vermont. From 1957 to 1958, he worked with David Lack as a postdoc.

For example, in his study, MacArthur found that the Setophaga tigrina (cape may warbler) and the Setophaga fusca (blackburnian warbler) dominated the tops of spruce trees, each species having different feeding strategies. Conservative species like the Setophaga castanea (bay-breasted warbler) behaved differently from the more general Setophaga virens (black-throated green warbler), which spent much time at the base of trees but were also seen at the top. Species like the Setophaga tigrina, which hunt insects, and the Setophaga castanea, which move stealthily from tree to tree, were the most active.

Cape May Warbler (Setophaga tigrina) — TR: Kaplan Ötleğeni — PHOTO BY UTKU PERKTAŞ; CENTRAL PARK, NY.

Even today, bird watchers trying to repeat MacArthur’s study may not find the same species combinations in the same tree parts. This is because bird populations and individuals continuously adapt to environmental changes. MacArthur’s study reflects a period when an abundance of spruce budworms led to a population increase in cape may warblers. This shows that niches are not static; they are flexible areas of expertise that dynamically adapt to resources, competitors, and overall climate changes.

--

--

Utku Perktas
Biogeography Letters

I am an ornithologist and evolutionary biologist with practical and theoretical experience ranging from museum based studies to molecular genetics.